Friday, April 25, 2014

UTeach Unit Project Development

On this page you will find several videos that help you learn how to develop your UTeach PBI Unit Project. Use the videos and the UTeach Resources site below to develop yours...


UTeach Resources Site - This site provides examples of PBI Unit Projects created by UTeach students at UT-Austin.

Setting Up a Blog - This video describes the process of setting up a blog for UTB UTeach students to develop their PBI Unit Project.

Adding Text to Introduction - This short video tutorial shows you how to cut and paste text to add to the introduction section

Adding Concept Map PDF to Blog - This video describes the process to create and save a pdf file of a concept map created on the Cmap tool program.

Adding Calendars to Blog - This video describes the steps needed to add calendars to your blog.

Monday, March 24, 2014

Session 11 - March 24, 2014

Reading Assignment

The next reading will be Boaler, J. (2002). Paying the Price for "Sugar and Spice": Shifting the Analytical Lens in Equity Research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 4(2&3), 127-144.  LINK



Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Session 10 - January 14, 2014

AGENDA


  • Review Story Board for Anchor Video
  • Campus Contact and Assignment
  • Reading List

Pellegrino, J. W., & Brophy, S. (2008). From cognitive theory to instructional practice: Technology and the evolution of anchored instruction. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Drummer, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Understanding the models of learning and instruction. New York: Springer. LINK

Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., & Kinzer, C. K. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology. (pp. 1151141). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kumar, D. D. (2010). Approaches to interactive video anchors in problem1based science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology 19, pp. 13119.

Kumar Anchor Video LINK






Monday, December 30, 2013

Session 9 - December 30. 2013

AGENDA


Article Discussion
  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. & Clark (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41 (2), 75-86. LINK
  • Kumar, D. D. (March, 2009). Approaches to Interactive Video Anchors in Problem-based Science Learning. LINK

Anchor Video
To view the lesson video click HERE.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Session 8 - December 26, 2013



Students discussed New York Times article and brought up more interested thoughts about how they would implement math or science reviews and use of type face.

The students presented and refined their presentation topic which they will now use to develop an anchor video. They were assigned to read Kirschner, et. al (2006) to discuss on Monday.

Tomorrow they will work on their idea behind their anchor video and prepare to present it on Monday.


AGENDA

Welcome
Class Discussion
  • Discuss New York Times Article

  • Develop outline of anchor video

Readings
  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. & Clark (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41 (2), 75-86. LINK
  • Kumar, D. D. (March, 2009). Approaches to Interactive Video Anchors in Problem-based Science Learning. LINK



Videos
Session 8 Video  HERE
Session 7 Video  HERE.

Monday, December 23, 2013

Session 7 - December 24, 2013

Today the students would take the lead and explain the challenges and problem encountered in developing a problem. There still needs to be more work to be done. I'm certain that the next two class meetings will open their minds to other ideas.

One critique was that the project did not integrate science content. Several ideas were provided, but the project idea is still a little fuzzy. I believe there needs to be more specificity in their idea so that they can begin working on the next part of the project.

The session provided more insight into the philosophical leanings of the students. They confided in that they were interested in a particular area, math or science, based on the experiences that they had in high school. For example, one student indicated that they loved science in middle school, but lost interest when they reached high school.

The students presented using Google Drive presentation slides and shared it with everyone.


AGENDA

Welcome

Project Team Presentation

  • Challenges and Problems Encountered
  • Solutions
  • Presentation




Video
To view the video for Session 6, Part A HERE




Reading for Thursday, December 26, 2013

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/19/health/19mind.html?_r=1& HERE

Anchor Video

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Session 6 - December 23, 2013


Implementing the class has become easier. Both the students and I have begun to develop a good feel for how to conduct the class. What is becoming more apparent is that students seem to be more open in discussions and have begun to take part without asking. The initial sessions required that I select a student to speak. I would then select the students in sequence (e.g., Round One - Student A, Student B, Student C; Round Two - Student B, Student C,  Student A, and so on...). The last few times it just took asking a question and then someone responded. I then continued to rotate the students, but now I've allowed the students to pick up on the thoughts of another student.


Survey Results
A survey for the week was distributed so that students could rate their understanding of class content, their participation, and the implementation of the course by the instructor. The survey results indicated high scores on the six questions asked. Students rated their involvement in class sessions as the weakest area. They rated their ability to communicate in class and satisfaction with the instructor as high. They indicated that collaboration with peers as an area that needs work. I recommended that they consider using Google Plus for collaborative work.

Article Discussions
Unfortunately, neither the students or I were able to access all of the articles. Rivet & Krajcik's was read and discussed. Also, the instructor provided an additional link to support the development of a project plan. Students were able to read a webpage resource to support their project development. We all went over the components and the instructor responded to questions.

The big idea behind Rivet & Krajcik's article was to understand the behavior of students' participation and involvement in a project based activity. Students were able to connect to student behaviors.


AGENDA

Welcome

Class Discussions
Survey Results from Week 1

Survey Questions
Q1 – Rate your satisfaction with the course this week.
Q2 – Rate your ability to communicate in class discussions.
Q3 – Rate your understanding of the course content this week.
Q4 – Rate your satisfaction with the instructor.
Q5 – Rate your level of collaboration with peers.
Q6 – Rate you involvement in class sessions.


Today's session will be split in to two parts.

  • Part A - Discuss what to expected when implementing an inquiry lesson.
    • Readings Discussion - Limited access
    • Read Krajcik & Blumenfeld (2006) (Not in Library Collection)
    • Read Rivet & Krajcik (2004) (science) OR Petrosino, Lehrer, & Schauble (2003) (math); (Not in Library Collection)


Video Archive

  • The video for Session 5 can be found HERE.